From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zinnermon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 21, 1987
511 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-294.

August 21, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Andrew D. Owens, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant attacks both his judgment and sentence in this appeal. We affirm the judgment. However, we find merit in the point attacking the sentence.

The trial court exceeded the guidelines for the sole reason that appellant was an habitual offender. Subsequent to the sentencing herein, the Florida Supreme Court decided Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986), holding that a departure based on habitual offender status is invalid.

Consequently, we reverse the sentence herein and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. Otherwise, affirmed.

DANAHY, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zinnermon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 21, 1987
511 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Zinnermon v. State

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST ZINNERMON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 21, 1987

Citations

511 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Zinnermon v. State

This court reversed and remanded the appellant's first sentences for resentencing within the recommended…