From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zinna v. Congrove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01016-RPM (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01016-RPM

10-16-2012

MICHAEL L. ZINNA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES CONGROVE, individually, Defendant.


ORDER PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE ON REMAND

Pursuant to the Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and the opinion of that court directing that this court reconsider the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees, applying the three factors set forth in Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103, 116-22 (1992) and the additional order of the appellate court granting the appellant's motion for attorney fees for this appeal with direction that this court determine the amount of the award, it is

ORDERED that in compliance with those directions, this court will consider the relevant papers on file with this court and the Court of Appeals, including the appellate briefs.

BY THE COURT:

____________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Zinna v. Congrove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01016-RPM (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Zinna v. Congrove

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. ZINNA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES CONGROVE, individually, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01016-RPM (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2012)