Opinion
November 27, 1961
In consolidated actions for money had and received, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 19, 1960, as denied his motion, pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out as insufficient in law certain affirmative defenses set forth in the answer of the defendant, Anna Eidelberg. This consolidated action is now pending against the said defendant only. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.