From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ZIMMERMAN v. WARDEN, FCI ALLENWOOD

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 22, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6100 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 22, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6100.

April 22, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this, 21st day of April, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus; the motion to dismiss, to which Petitioner has not responded; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Unexhausted (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED;
3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as unexhausted;
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

ZIMMERMAN v. WARDEN, FCI ALLENWOOD

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 22, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6100 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 22, 2011)
Case details for

ZIMMERMAN v. WARDEN, FCI ALLENWOOD

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW ZIMMERMAN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI ALLENWOOD, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 22, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-6100 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 22, 2011)