From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zimmerman v. Cason

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 30, 2006
Case No. 05-70283 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-70283.

November 30, 2006


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majoub's Report and Recommendation dated September 8, 2006. Petitioner filed objections on September 18, 2006.

The Magistrate Judge recommended that Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus be denied. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions of law.

The Court agrees that Petitioner failed to show that he was deprived of a fair trial by the admission of Detective Larson's testimony or that the trial court abused its discretion by qualifying him as an expert in fingerprint analysis and identification. Petitioner failed to demonstrate his counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the testimony and evidence regarding Petitioner's prior convictions, or by failing to object to and move to suppress evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Petitioner failed to show that there was judicial misconduct during his trial, or that his sentence violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Petitioner likewise failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to grant Petitioner's motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The Court agrees that Petitioner's claims, specifically, that he was denied due process when the prosecution withheld favorable information regarding co-defendant Smith's plea agreement and denied a fair trial because the trial court failed to make a specific fact inquiry into each declaration of co-defendant Smith, are procedurally defaulted pursuant to M.C.R. 6.508(D). Lastly, the Court agrees that Petitioner has failed to establish the requisite cause and prejudice to overcome this default.

The comments of the judge during sentencing were harsh and in this Court's mind injected too much personal, as opposed to legal basis for imposing the sentence. (Tr. of July 9, 1999 Sentencing of Allen Zimmerman, p. 25, lns. 22-25, p. 26, ln. 1). However, such comments do not render the sentence herein unconstitutional.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majoub's Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 38, filed September 8, 2006] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus is DENIED.


Summaries of

Zimmerman v. Cason

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 30, 2006
Case No. 05-70283 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Zimmerman v. Cason

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN ZIMMERMAN, JR., Petitioner, v. JOHN CASON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-70283 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2006)