From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zimmerman v. Bank

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 13, 1925
150 N.E. 920 (Ohio 1925)

Opinion

No. 19156

Decided October 13, 1925.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — Constitutional question not presented in Court of Appeals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. George D. Hile, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Bernon, Mulligan, Keeley LeFever, for defendants in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause, and the alleged constitutional question was not presented to or passed upon by the Court of Appeals.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zimmerman v. Bank

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 13, 1925
150 N.E. 920 (Ohio 1925)
Case details for

Zimmerman v. Bank

Case Details

Full title:ZIMMERMAN v. MORRIS PLAN BANK OF CLEVELAND, OHIO, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 13, 1925

Citations

150 N.E. 920 (Ohio 1925)
150 N.E. 920

Citing Cases

State v. Phillips

"It is an established rule of long standing in this state that a constitutional question, either in a civil…

State v. Lynn

"It is an established rule of long standing in this state that a constitutional question, either in a civil…