Summary
In Zimmerman Slate Roofing Specialists, LLC, a non-precedential opinion, the Superior Court likewise held that serving an unidentified security guard at the Philadelphia District Attorney's office was adequate service of process on the defendant assistant district attorney because there was "no material distinction" between that office and the public defender's office in Williams.
Summary of this case from Smierciak v. City of Pittsburgh Police Dep'tOpinion
NO. 418 EDA 2013
2014-03-31
Zimmermans Slate Roofing v. M. Seidner
Appeal From: No. M0002 Nov. Term 2011 (Philadelphia)
Disposition: Affirmed.