From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zimmer v. Zimmer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 19, 1976
328 So. 2d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-1150.

March 19, 1976.

Petition from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Russell E. Seay, Jr., J.

John L. O'Brien, of Clarke, O'Brien Wutt, Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

Marshall G. Curran, Jr., of English, McCaughan O'Bryan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of an order denying his petition to modify certain provisions of a property settlement agreement pertaining to alimony.

We affirm the order appealed from as to the refusal to modify the provision for payment of lump sum alimony since that character of alimony is not subject to modification pursuant to § 61.14 F.S. 1973. Gordon v. Gordon, Fla.App.3d 1967, 204 So.2d 734; Horne v. Horne, Fla.App. 2d 1974, 289 So.2d 39.

We also affirm the order appealed from as to the periodic alimony because we feel it was within the trial court's discretion to determine that any non self-created financial problems appellant encountered may be only temporary. If after a more reliable period of time appellant can demonstrate that the condition persists, then he may reapply for relief.

AFFIRMED.

WALDEN, C.J., and ANDREWS, JOHN S., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Zimmer v. Zimmer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 19, 1976
328 So. 2d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Zimmer v. Zimmer

Case Details

Full title:PAUL H. ZIMMER, APPELLANT, v. JEAN W. ZIMMER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 19, 1976

Citations

328 So. 2d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Urbanek v. Urbanek

The cases uniformly hold to the contrary. The rule that emerges from consideration of this issue is that a…

Turner v. Turner

Nor is lump-sum alimony subject to modification. Storer v. Storer, 353 So.2d 152 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Zimmer v.…