From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zika v. Rocky Mountain Prestress Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 30, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01283-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01283-CMA-MEH

10-30-2012

GARRY ZIKA, Plaintiff, v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN PRESTRESS INC., Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 30, 2012.

Plaintiff's "Motion: Not to Dismiss" [filed October 25, 2012; docket #59] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(D) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G. Rule 5(a)(1)(D) requires that a written motion filed with the Court must be served on every party. Local Rule 5.1G requires, in pertinent part, that "[e]ach paper, other than one filed ex parte, shall be accompanied by a certificate of service indicating the date it was served, the name and address of the person to whom it was sent, and the manner of service." Plaintiff's motion contains no indication of service on Defendant.


Summaries of

Zika v. Rocky Mountain Prestress Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 30, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01283-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Zika v. Rocky Mountain Prestress Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARRY ZIKA, Plaintiff, v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN PRESTRESS INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01283-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 30, 2012)