From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zigmont v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Nov 22, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11CV134 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11CV134

11-22-2011

JAMES S. ZIGMONT, Plaintiff, v. ANEGLA JONES, Defendant.


(Judge Keeley)

ORDER ADOPTING SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 1, 2011, pro se petitioner, James Zigmont ("Zigmont"), filed his "Petition To Release and Expunge the Record of Erroneous Tax Lien and Holds on Property" [complaint] in the Circuit Court of Harrison County, West Virginia. The United States, on behalf of its agency, the Internal Revenue Service, removed the action to this Court on August 18, 2011. On August 24, 2011 Zigmont moved to remand his case, for sanctions, and for an emergency hearing. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A)-(B) and L.R. Civ. P. 7.02(c), the Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull for initial screening and a report and recommendation. On September 8, 2011, Judge Kaull issued a Report and Recommendation ("first R&R") recommending that all of Mr. Zigmont's motions be denied. On September 27, 2011, the Court adopted the first R&R and denied Zigmont's motions (dkt. no. 18).

On September 28, 2011, the defendant, Angela Jones ("Jones"), filed a motion to dismiss Zigmont's complaint (dkt. no. 19). On November 2, 2011, Judge Kaull issued a second Report and Recommendation ("second R&R") recommending that the defendant's motion to dismiss be granted for failure to state a claim over which this Court may assert jurisdiction (dkt. no. 25).

The Report and Recommendation also specifically warned that Zigmont's failure to object to the recommendations would result in the waiver of his appellate rights on this issue. Nevertheless, Zigmont has not filed any objections.

Zigmont's failure to object to the Report and Recommendation not only waives his appellate rights in this matter, but also relieves the Court of any obligation to conduct a de novo review of the issue presented. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-153 (1985); Wells v. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1997).

Consequently, the Court ADOPTS the second R&R in its entirety, GRANTS the defendant's motion to dismiss, and ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and stricken from docket.

It is so ORDERED.

The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to transmit copies of this order to counsel of record and to the pro se petitioner, certified mail, return receipt requested.

IRENE M. KEELEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Zigmont v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Nov 22, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11CV134 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Zigmont v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:JAMES S. ZIGMONT, Plaintiff, v. ANEGLA JONES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11CV134 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 22, 2011)