From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zielinski v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 3, 2019
9:17-CV-1042 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 3, 2019)

Opinion

9:17-CV-1042 (DNH/TWD)

07-03-2019

JEREMY ZIELINSKI, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY ANNUCCI, DOCCS Acting Commissioner; MICHAEL KIRKPATRICK, Clinton Correctional Facility Superintendent; and JOHN DOES 1-9, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: JEREMY ZIELINSKI Plaintiff pro se 16-A-3601 Auburn Correctional Facility P.O. Box 618 Auburn, NY 13021 HON. LETITIA JAMES Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendants The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 WILLIAM A. SCOTT, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


APPEARANCES: JEREMY ZIELINSKI
Plaintiff pro se
16-A-3601
Auburn Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 618
Auburn, NY 13021 HON. LETITIA JAMES
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224 WILLIAM A. SCOTT, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Jeremy Zielinski brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 19, 2019, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's motion seeking injunctive relief regarding denial of meals at Clinton Correctional Facility be denied without prejudice; plaintiff's motion seeking injunctive relief regarding his placement in involuntary protective custody at Clinton Correctional Facility be denied as moot; and plaintiff's motion seeking to be returned to Clinton Correctional Facility be denied. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Magistrate Judge Dancks also made numerous rulings on plaintiff's motion to amend.

It is noted that plaintiff requested and was granted numerous extensions of time in which to submit objections but has failed to do so. A recent letter from plaintiff details the reasons why he was allegedly unable to submit objections; this same justification has been presented to the court before. In any event, a careful review of the entire file has been made. --------

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Plaintiff's motion seeking injunctive relief regarding denial of meals at Clinton Correctional Facility, Dkt. 17, is DENIED without prejudice;

2. Plaintiff's motion seeking injunctive relief regarding his placement in involuntary protective custody at Clinton Correctional Facility, Dkt. 28, is DENIED as moot;

3. Plaintiff's motion seeking to be returned to Clinton Correctional Facility, Dkt. 43, is DENIED; and

4. In accordance with Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation and Order, plaintiff is directed to submit a copy of the final page of his proposed First Amended Complaint, Dkt. 29-3 at 3, to this Court bearing his original signature within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order.

/s/_________

United States District Judge Dated: July 3, 2019

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Zielinski v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 3, 2019
9:17-CV-1042 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Zielinski v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY ZIELINSKI, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY ANNUCCI, DOCCS Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 3, 2019

Citations

9:17-CV-1042 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 3, 2019)

Citing Cases

Smolen v. Brown

; cf. Zielinski v. Annucci, No. 17-CV-1042, 2019 WL 2870337, at *10 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2019), report and…

Lewis v. Hanson

And, even if Yelich were responsible for the lack of security cameras at Bare Hill, Yelich's conduct would…