From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zieev v. Saidov

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Apr 20, 2016
8:16CV56 (D. Neb. Apr. 20, 2016)

Opinion

8:16CV56

04-20-2016

DALER KHUSEINOVICH ZIEEV, Plaintiff, v. UMED SAIDOV, FARKHOD SAIDOV, TJK TRANSPORT, LLC, and FREIGHT ON TIME, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the court sua sponte. Two of the defendants filed answers on their own behalves. See Filing Nos. 5 and 6. One of the individual defendants, Umed Saidov, also filed an answer on behalf of the defendants TJK Transport, LLC, and Freight On Time, LLC. See Filing No. 7. Umed Saidov distinguished the answer on behalf of the two companies by noting he was doing so in his capacity as their "registered agent." Id. Legal counsel has not entered an appearance on behalf of any of the defendants.

"In all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel as, by the rules of such courts, respectively, are permitted to manage and conduct causes therein." 28 U.S.C. § 1654. "[U]nlicensed individuals may not represent other parties in Federal Court under this Statute." Turner v. Am. Bar Ass'n , 407 F. Supp. 451, 475 (N.D. Tex. 1975) aff'd sub nom. Taylor v. Montgomery , 539 F.2d 715 (7th Cir. 1976) and aff'd sub nom. Pilla v. Am. Bar Ass'n , 542 F.2d 56 (8th Cir. 1976). "[A] corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel." Rowland v. California Men's Colony , 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993); Ackra Direct Mktg. Corp. v. Fingerhut Corp., 86 F.3d 852, 857 (8th Cir. 1996). "[T]he rationale for that rule applies equally to all artificial entities." Rowland , 506 U.S. at 202. Natural persons only may petition courts themselves and appear pro se. Id. at 203.

[B]ecause pro se means to appear for one's self, a person may not appear on another person's behalf in the other's cause. A person must be litigating an interest personal to
him. For example, a lay person may not represent a corporation or a partnership or appear on behalf of his or her own minor child.
lannaccone v. Law , 142 F.3d 553, 558 (2d Cir. 1998); see also Guest v. Hansen , 603 F.3d 15, 20 (2d Cir. 2010) (holding "an administr[ator] or execut[or] of an estate may not proceed pro se when the estate has beneficiaries or creditors other than the litigant").

There is no evidence in the record Mr. Saidov is a licensed attorney. In the Eighth Circuit, an entity is technically in default absent representation by licensed counsel. Ackra Direct , 86 F.3d at 857. The court allowed the defendants time to secure counsel. The defendants failed to respond to the order or obtain counsel. Accordingly, the court will enter an order striking the corporate defendants' answer.

IT IS ORDERED:

The Clerk of Court shall strike the answer (Filing No. 7) filed on behalf of the defendants TJK Transport, LLC, and Freight On Time, LLC.

Dated this 20th day of April, 2016.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Thomas D. Thalken

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Zieev v. Saidov

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Apr 20, 2016
8:16CV56 (D. Neb. Apr. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Zieev v. Saidov

Case Details

Full title:DALER KHUSEINOVICH ZIEEV, Plaintiff, v. UMED SAIDOV, FARKHOD SAIDOV, TJK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Apr 20, 2016

Citations

8:16CV56 (D. Neb. Apr. 20, 2016)