From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ziajka v. Pace Plumbing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1998
254 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 26, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs payable to the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, those branches of the respective motions of the appellants Eugene Iovine, Inc., H F Kornfeld, Inc., and Citnalta Construction Company which were to dismiss the plaintiffs' causes of action based on Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence are granted, the complaint is dismissed in its entirety against those appellants, those branches of the motion of the defendant Pace Plumbing Corp. which were to dismiss the plaintiffs' causes of action based on Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence and all cross claims asserted against it is granted, and the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against that appellant.

The injured plaintiff's claim that he was struck by a plank which fell off a scaffold owned by one of the appellant contractors is pure speculation. Other than the injured plaintiff's surmise, there is no evidence that he was hit by a plank, or, if so, that the offending board fell from a scaffold instead of from one of the catwalks which his employer, the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, maintained in the basement area where his accident occurred. The injured plaintiff never claimed to have seen such a scaffold and the appellant contractors all denied either working in the basement area where the plaintiff was injured, or having a scaffold there ( see, Bernstein v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 1020; Tsamos v. Volmar Constr, Co., 231 A.D.2d 709; Vinicio v. Marriott Corp., 217 A.D.2d 656; Earle v. Channel Home Ctr., 158 A.D.2d 507; Felgenhauer v. Atlantic Pac. Tea Co., 94 A.D.2d 737).

O'Brien, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ziajka v. Pace Plumbing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1998
254 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Ziajka v. Pace Plumbing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PAWEL ZIAJKA et al., Respondents, v. PACE PLUMBING CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 631

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Absolute Elec. Contr. Co.

This dispute, however, is immaterial, as Tucker's testimony that he must have been electrocuted by wires…

Thomasulo v. State

Defendant correctly points out that Claimants have presented no evidence concerning who created that rip-rap…