From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zhi Yang Zhou v. David

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2011
No. C09-6059 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. C09-6059 JSC

11-02-2011

ZHI YANG ZHOU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JIANG DAVID, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO PLAINTIFFS

On August 30, 2011, the parties stipulated to continue the case management conference ("CMC") scheduled for August 31, 2011 to September 15, 2011. The parties explained that Plaintiffs' counsel Adam Wang had been "informed that a new counsel has been retained for Plaintiffs to substitute in his place" but that no substitution had yet been made. (Dkt. No. 61.) Upon this representation the Court continued the CMC to the parties' chosen date, September 15, 2011.

Plaintiffs did not submit a case management conference statement for the September 15, 2011 CMC. Nor had new counsel substituted in for Plaintiffs' counsel. In order to give Plaintiffs yet a further opportunity to substitute new counsel, the Court continued the CMC to November 3, 2011 and admonished Plaintiffs' counsel to file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement.

Unfortunately, as of the date of this Order--the day before the CMC--Plaintiffs have, once again, not submitted a CMC statement, either jointly or separately. Nor did Plaintiffs' counsel even respond to a courtesy email reminder sent by the Deputy Clerk. And Plaintiffs' counsel has not moved to withdraw. These failures are not the first time Plaintiffs have ignored the rules of the Court in this action. In July 2011, the settlement judge, Magistrate Judge Zimmerman, ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failing to timely file a settlement conference statement. (Dkt. No. 54.)

Accordingly, in light of Plaintiffs' repeated failures to file case management conference statements, and their apparent inability to settle on representation in this case, Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 for a failure to prosecute. The Court will address the matter at the case management conference scheduled for 1:30 p.m. tomorrow, November 3, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Zhi Yang Zhou v. David

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2011
No. C09-6059 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Zhi Yang Zhou v. David

Case Details

Full title:ZHI YANG ZHOU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JIANG DAVID, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

No. C09-6059 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)