From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zhao v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 23, 2016
645 F. App'x 554 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 13-71432

03-23-2016

JUNSHI ZHAO, AKA Jinshi Zhao, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A099-734-835 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Junshi Zhao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency's factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency's adverse credibility determination based on inconsistencies in the record as to Zhao's attendance of house church services, arrest, former employment, and the nature of mistreatment during his second interrogation. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the "totality of circumstances"). Zhao's explanations for these inconsistencies do not compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the absence of credible testimony, Zhao's asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency's denial of Zhao's CAT claim because it was based on the same evidence found not credible and the record does not otherwise compel the finding that it is more likely than not Zhao would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to China. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048-49.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Zhao v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 23, 2016
645 F. App'x 554 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Zhao v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:JUNSHI ZHAO, AKA Jinshi Zhao, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

645 F. App'x 554 (9th Cir. 2016)