From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ben-Yu Zhan v. Sun Wing Wo Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1994
208 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 17, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The decision to grant or deny permission for counsel to withdraw lies within the discretion of the trial court, and the court's decision will not be overturned absent a showing of an improvident exercise of discretion (see, Haskell v. Haskell, 185 A.D.2d 333). Based upon the papers submitted and the fact that the defendant Wonton Deluxe, Inc., did not oppose its counsel's motion to withdraw, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in permitting counsel to withdraw. Thompson, J.P., Miller, O'Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ben-Yu Zhan v. Sun Wing Wo Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1994
208 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Ben-Yu Zhan v. Sun Wing Wo Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BEN-YU ZHAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. SUN WING WO REALTY CORP., Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 523

Citing Cases

Winters v. Winters

Moreover, he did not oppose the nonparty appellant's motion for leave to withdraw as his counsel. Under these…

Saucedo v. City Univ. of N.Y.

In view of the foregoing, and the lack of opposition to this application by claimant, I find that there has…