From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zguris v. K-Mart Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 23, 2001
285 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 3, 2001.

July 23, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated February 29, 2000, as granted the motion of the defendant Kmart Corporation s/h/a K-Mart Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Cartier, Hogan, Sullivan, Bernstein Auerbach, Patchogue, N Y (William A. Wittman of counsel), for appellants.

Simmons, Jannace Stagg, LLP, East Meadow, N.Y. (David B. DeSiver of counsel), for respondent.

Adler Larkin (Mauro Goldberg Lilling, LLP, Great Neck, N Y [Caryn L. Lilling, Christopher Simone, and Katherine Herr Solomon] of counsel), for defendant Laro Maintenance Corporation.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

During an ongoing snowstorm on December 31, 1996, the plaintiff Michael Zguris (hereinafter the plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water located within 25 feet inside the entrance to a store owned by the defendant Kmart Corporation s/h/a K-Mart Corp. (hereinafter K-Mart). The plaintiffs alleged, inter alia, that K-Mart failed to properly maintain the premises. After the completion of depositions, K-Mart moved for summary judgment, asserting that the plaintiff fell in a puddle created by melted snow that accumulated during an ongoing snowstorm, that it was not liable for the plaintiff's injuries because it had no notice of any alleged puddle, and that it had not had sufficient time to clean up the puddle. K-Mart met its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact to defeat summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted K-Mart's motion for summary judgment.

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, FEUERSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zguris v. K-Mart Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 23, 2001
285 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Zguris v. K-Mart Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ZGURIS, ET AL., appellants, v. K-MART CORP., respondent, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 23, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
728 N.Y.S.2d 188

Citing Cases

Matthews v. County of Orange

The defendants met their initial burden of showing, as a matter of law, that there was insufficient time for…