From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Z.F v. Ripon Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00523-GEB-JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00523-GEB-JFM

10-24-2011

Z.F, a minor, by and through his parents M.A.F and J.F. and M.A.F. and J.F. individually; L.H., and J.H., minors, by and through their parents J.A. and J.R.H. and J.A. and J.R.H. individually; A.N., a minor, by and through his parents, G.N. and M.R., and G.N. and M.R. individually, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (RUSD); RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES; SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION; VALLEY MOUNTAIN REGIONAL CENTER (VMRC), MODESTO CITY SCHOOLS, MODESTO CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, RICHARD JACOBS, Executive Director of VMRC, in his official and individual capacity, TARA SISEMORE-HESTER, Coordinator for Autism Services for VMRC, in her official and individual capacity; VIRGINIA JOHNSON, Director of Modesto City Schools SELPA, in her official and individual capacity; SUE SWARTZLANDER, Program Director for Modesto City Schools, in her official and individual capacity and Does 1 - 200. Defendants. VALLEY MOUNTAIN REGIONAL CENTER, RICHARD JACOBS and TARA SISEMORE-HESTER Counterclaimants, v. M.A.F. and J.A., SPECIAL NEEDS ADVOCATES FOR UNDERSTANDING, and AUTISM REFORM CALIFORNIA Counterdefendants.

Tamara Loughrey Attorney for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Rod Levin Attorney for Ripon Unified School District Defendants G. Daniel Newland Cassandra Carrol Attorneys for Valley Mountain Regional Center Defendants and Counterclaimants Michelle Cannon Attorney for Modesto City Schools Defendants


LOUGHREY & ASSOCIATES

TAMARA LOUGHREY, Bar No. 227001

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants M.A.F.,

J.A. and Defendant SPECIAL NEEDS ADVOCATES

FOR UNDERSTANDING

REQUEST AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RULE 26 INITIAL

DISCLOSURES DATE AND THE DATE FOR ADDING 'DOE' DEFENDANTS;

[PROPOSED] ORDER ATTACHED

Judge: Honorable Garland E. Burrell Jr.

STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND INITIAL DISCLOSURES

The parties in the above captioned case hereby stipulate to continue the date for the initial disclosures pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26 from November 4, 2011, the date specified in their September 19, 2011 Joint Status Report, to December 15, 2011. The reason for this stipulation and request is due to Plaintiffs' counsel's serious medical condition, stage IV colon cancer. Ms. Loughrey has developed new cancer and as a result must change to a new treatment regime which will be very time consuming initially. See attached Loughrey declaration and her doctor's letter for more information regarding her health situation. Accordingly, the parties request that the date for the initial disclosures be continued for 45 days to December 15, 2011.

STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE

DATE TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO ADD DOE DEFENDANTS

Additionally, the parties stipulate to continue the date for plaintiffs' amendment to add 'Doe' defendants. In the court's Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order filed on September 29, 2011, the court ordered plaintiffs to add any 'Doe' defendants within 90 days from the date the order was filed, by December 28, 2011. Due to plaintiffs' counsel's unavailability due to medical necessity rendering her unable to work regularly for the next sixty days, she will not be able to meet this deadline. Plaintiffs' counsel notified all defense counsel and her clients as soon as she learned of the additional cancer in early October 2011 and the impact of her medical condition's affect on her ability to meet the deadlines in the case. See Loughrey Declaration for details regarding her health status. Plaintiffs' counsel also believes the initial disclosures and additional discovery are needed to appropriately identify any 'Doe' defendants. Therefore, the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for the amendment of the 'Doe' defendants to April 16, 2012. Pursuant to the court's September 29, 2011 order, class certification motions are also due by this date.

Tamara Loughrey

Attorney for Plaintiffs and

Counterdefendants

Rod Levin

Attorney for Ripon Unified School

District Defendants

G. Daniel Newland

Cassandra Carrol

Attorneys for Valley Mountain

Regional Center Defendants and

Counterclaimants

Michelle Cannon

Attorney for Modesto City Schools

Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on Plaintiffs' counsel's medical necessity and the parties' stipulation, good cause appearing therefore,

1. The November 4, 2011 date for Initial Disclosures and the December 28, 2011 date to amend the complaint to add 'Doe' defendants are both vacated.
2. Initial Disclosures shall be made on or before December 15, 2011.
3. The date to add 'Doe' defendants is extended to April 16, 2012.
It is so ordered.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Z.F v. Ripon Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00523-GEB-JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Z.F v. Ripon Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Z.F, a minor, by and through his parents M.A.F and J.F. and M.A.F. and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00523-GEB-JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)