From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zest Labs. v. WalMart Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 9, 2024
4:18CV00500 JM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 9, 2024)

Opinion

4:18CV00500 JM

07-09-2024

ZEST LABS, INC., et al PLAINTIFFS v. WALMART INC. DEFENDANT


ORDER

James M. Moody Jr. United States District Judge

In light of In re Sanford Law Firm, 2024 WL 3217609 (8th Cir. 2024), the Court is providing notice to Plaintiffs and counsel that represented Plaintiffs before and during trial (“Plaintiffs' Trial Counsel”) that the Court is considering sanctions against them for their misrepresentation to the Court regarding their knowledge of the Walmart Patent Application and the timing of their knowledge. See Tr. of Hr'g on Mot. for Sanctions, ECF No. 552; Order for New Trial, ECF No. 530. As a sanction, the Court is considering whether Plaintiffs and/or Plaintiffs' Trial Counsel should be ordered to pay Walmart's attorneys' fees up to and including $ 2,870,465.01.

Should Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs' Trial Counsel need further clarification of the specific conduct or potential sanction involved, they are directed to file a motion with the Court as soon as possible.

The Motion to Supplement the Record (ECF No. 558) is GRANTED. The parties and Plaintiffs' Trial Counsel may also supplement the record. All additions to the record may be presented at a hearing on the issue or must be filed by the date of the hearing. The hearing will be set by separate order.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Zest Labs. v. WalMart Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 9, 2024
4:18CV00500 JM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Zest Labs. v. WalMart Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ZEST LABS, INC., et al PLAINTIFFS v. WALMART INC. DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 9, 2024

Citations

4:18CV00500 JM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 9, 2024)