From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zervigon v. Shoemaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 15, 2000.

December 12, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated September 29, 1999, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was to preclude them from offering evidence at trial pertaining to the injured plaintiff's knee surgery.

Corpina Piergrossi Overzat Klar, LLP, Bronx, N.Y. (B. Jennifer Jaffee of counsel), for appellants.

Fiedelman McGaw, Jericho, N.Y. (Dawn C. DeSimone of counsel), for respondents.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants ' motion which was to preclude the plaintiffs from offering evidence at trial pertaining to the injured plaintiff's knee surgery (see, DiDomenico v. C S Aeromatick Supplies, 252 A.D.2d 41, 53; Squitieri v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 201; Kirkland v. New York City Hous. Auth., 236 A.D.2d 170).


Summaries of

Zervigon v. Shoemaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Zervigon v. Shoemaker

Case Details

Full title:RUDDY ZERVIGON, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MARVIN H. SHOEMAKER, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 193