From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zerbst v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 24, 2015
CASE NO. 14-10754 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 24, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 14-10754

03-24-2015

JEFFREY MICHAEL ZERBST, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REMANDING PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR

Plaintiff Jeffrey Zerbst brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. In her Decision, dated November 13, 2012, the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") concluded that Plaintiff was not entitled to benefits because he was capable of performing a significant number of jobs in the national economy.

After the Appeals Council denied review, Zerbst timely filed this action for judicial review of the Commissioner's decision. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated February 20, 2015, Magistrate Judge Majzoub recommended that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and that Plaintiff's motion be granted in part and denied in part. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four for a proper assessment of the opinion of Plaintiff's treating psychiatrist, Dr. Surendra Kelwala.

In her Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the R&R needed to be filed "within fourteen (14) days of service" and that a party's failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. (Doc. No. 16 at 16). Neither party filed an objection. Moreover, this Court agrees with the analysis contained in the R&R.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: March 24, 2015

s/Marianne O. Battani

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on March 24, 2015.

s/ Kay Doaks

Case Manager


Summaries of

Zerbst v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 24, 2015
CASE NO. 14-10754 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Zerbst v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY MICHAEL ZERBST, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 24, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 14-10754 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Shelly P. v. Kijakazi

Even, assuming arguendo that Doctor Lazzaro's notation does communicate “not repetitively” a misreading of…