From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zenteno v. MTA Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 2010
71 A.D.3d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-04243.

March 2, 2010.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hinds: Radix, J.), dated March 31, 2009, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Andrew C. Risoli, Eastchester, N.Y., for appellant.

Catherine A. Rinaldi, Jamaica, N.Y. (Christopher P. Yodice of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that the plaintiff was reckless, and that his recklessness was the sole proximate cause of his injuries ( see Wadhwa v Long Is. R.R., 13 AD3d 615; Lassalle v New York City Tr. Auth., 11 AD3d 661; Mooney v Long Is. R.R., 305 AD2d 560; Goo Yi Feng v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 285 AD2d 447, 447-448; cf. Brown v Long Is. R.R., 304 AD2d 601, 601-602). Since, in opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324).


Summaries of

Zenteno v. MTA Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 2010
71 A.D.3d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Zenteno v. MTA Long Island Rail Road

Case Details

Full title:EDUARDO ZENTENO, Appellant, v. MTA LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 2, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 1790
894 N.Y.S.2d 897