From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zembower v. City of Norfolk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 20, 2020
Civil No. 3:20cv386 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Jul. 20, 2020)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:20cv386 (DJN)

07-20-2020

JOSHUA ALAN ZEMBOWER, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner Joshua Alan Zembower ("Petitioner"), a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has submitted a petition for writ of habeas corpus complaining about his ongoing detention, the denial of bond, his potential extradition to Maryland, and his conditions of confinement. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner seeks immediate release and "the issuance of formal charges for any and all involved officials." (Id. at 15 (capitalization corrected).) By Memorandum Order entered on June 16, 2020, the Court explained that it would not conduct a general inquiry into what appears to be Maryland state court prosecution, his ongoing detention, or a denial of bond. (ECF No. 3.) Rather, Petitioner must identify a violation of federal or constitutional law. It is not clear from Petitioner's submissions whether he wishes to pursue a civil rights action challenging the conditions of his confinement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Rivenbark v. Virginia, 305 F. App'x 144, 145 (4th Cir. 2008). He may not do both by way of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Accordingly, on June 16, 2020, the Court provided Petitioner with forms for filing a complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983 or for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. (ECF No. 3.) The Court directed Petitioner to complete the forms for either a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition or a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and return the same to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry thereof. The Court explained that the failure to complete an appropriate form and return the same to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry hereof would result in the dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

More than fifteen (15) days have elapsed and Plaintiff has not completed and returned either form. Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall issue.

Let the Clerk file a copy of this Memorandum Opinion electronically and send a copy to Petitioner.

/s/_________

David J. Novak

United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia
Date: July 20, 2020


Summaries of

Zembower v. City of Norfolk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 20, 2020
Civil No. 3:20cv386 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Jul. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Zembower v. City of Norfolk

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA ALAN ZEMBOWER, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jul 20, 2020

Citations

Civil No. 3:20cv386 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Jul. 20, 2020)