From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zeman v. Pahs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 2, 2014
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01340-AP (D. Colo. Jul. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01340-AP

07-02-2014

(Bankruptcy Case No. 10-15557-EEB) STEPHEN LINDSEY PAHS Debtor. SALLY ZEMAN, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellant, v. STEPHEN LINDSEY PAHS, Appellee.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER OF REMAND

Blackburn, J.

This matter is before me on the order [#49] of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed February 20, 2014, and the mandate [#51] of that court filed March 14, 2014. This order of remand complies with the requirements of the order [#49] of the Tenth Circuit.

"[#49]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

On March 27, 2012, I entered an Order Reversing Judgments in the above-captioned case and in a companion case, Gordon v. Bank of America, Civil Action No. 11-cv-00960-AP. In its order [#49], the Tenth Circuit dismissed the Gordon appeal for lack of jurisdiction and concluded that the circumstances of the Gordon case "do not warrant a remand to permit the district court to consider certifying its earlier order for an immediate appeal." Order [#49], p. 10. In the Pahs case, the Tenth Circuit dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the Pahs case "to the district court with directions to vacate that court's decision as it pertains to Pahs, and further to remand this case to the bankruptcy court with directions to vacate that court's decision addressing Pahs' modification of the model Chapter 13 plan." Order [#49], p. 10. I enter this order to comply with those directives concerning the Pahs case.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the decision and order of this court stated in the Order Reversing Judgments [#34] filed March 27, 2012, are VACATED to the extent that decision and order address the issues raised in Stephen Lindsey Pahs, Debtor, Bankruptcy Case No. 10-15557-EEB, and Zeman v. Pahs, Civil Action No. 11-cv-01340-AP; and

2. That Stephen Lindsey Pahs, Debtor, Bankruptcy Case No. 10-15557-EEB, and Zeman v. Pahs, Civil Action No. 11-cv-01340-AP are REMANDED to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado with directions to vacate that court's decision addressing the modification of the model Chapter 13 plan by the debtor, Stephen Lindsey Pahs.

Dated July 2, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

__________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Zeman v. Pahs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 2, 2014
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01340-AP (D. Colo. Jul. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Zeman v. Pahs

Case Details

Full title:(Bankruptcy Case No. 10-15557-EEB) STEPHEN LINDSEY PAHS Debtor. SALLY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01340-AP (D. Colo. Jul. 2, 2014)