From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zelnik v. Zelnik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 9, 1993
196 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

September 9, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.).


The parties initially agreed to joint custody with the child to reside with the mother and the father to have liberal visitation. There has been acrimony between the parties which may have impinged upon the child's emotional and intellectual development (cf., Matter of Louise E.S. v W. Stephen S., 64 N.Y.2d 946).

The trial court's findings are to be accorded great respect (Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173), and the trial court was free to reject the opinions of both the Law Guardian and the court-appointed psychiatrist (see, State of New York ex rel. H.K. v M.S., 187 A.D.2d 50, 53). The child's preference was properly deemed not controlling because of the potential for influence having been exerted (see, O'Connor v O'Connor, 146 A.D.2d 909, 911). There was no showing of bias on the part of the court and it acted within its discretion in refusing rebuttal testimony (see, Capone v Gannon, 150 A.D.2d 749, 750).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Zelnik v. Zelnik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 9, 1993
196 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Zelnik v. Zelnik

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA P. ZELNIK, Respondent, v. MICHEL R. ZELNIK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 9, 1993

Citations

196 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
601 N.Y.S.2d 701

Citing Cases

Young v. Young

In weighing the child's expressed preference, "the court must consider the age and maturity of the child and…

Straus v. Strauss

In a prior order, the motion court cited certain safety concerns for the child while in defendant's care, but…