From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zellis v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 12, 2013
No. 63071 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. 63071

12-12-2013

MICHAEL JOSEPH ZELLIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a petition for a writ of mandamus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jennifer P. Togliatti, Kathy A. Hardcastle, Judges.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

In his petition, filed on February 8, 2013, appellant sought an order compelling the preparation and production at the State's expense of transcripts from a January 4, 2011, hearing. Appellant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

_________________, J.

Pickering
_________________, J.
Hardesty
_________________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge

Hon. Kathy A. Hardcastle, Senior Judge

Michael Joseph Zellis

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Zellis v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 12, 2013
No. 63071 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Zellis v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JOSEPH ZELLIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 12, 2013

Citations

No. 63071 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2013)