From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ZELL v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-250 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-250.

June 27, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2007, after the plaintiffs, Jeffrey C. Zell and Ronna Sue Zell, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after defendant, Federal Insurance Company, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and after objections were filed by defendant, and a response to the objections was filed by plaintiff, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket no. 20) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

ZELL v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-250 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2007)
Case details for

ZELL v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY C. ZELL, RONNA SUE ZELL, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 27, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-250 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

Wezorek v. Allstate Insurance Company

In the cases that followed, which interpreted the amended version of § 4117(g), the "pattern" requirement was…

Paul v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

The facts here are analogous to the misrepresentations found not to be material in the following cases. Zell…