From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ZELL v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 29, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0221 RRB GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0221 RRB GGH.

February 29, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a response to the order to show cause, filed January 25, 2008. Although the request was signed by plaintiff's wife who is not plaintiff's attorney of record or a party to this action, and may not bring a request on his behalf, the court in any event will grant the request.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's February 15, 2008 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, or to file a summary judgment motion. No further extensions will be granted.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the order on plaintiff's new address of record, as reflected in the February 15th filing.


Summaries of

ZELL v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 29, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0221 RRB GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)
Case details for

ZELL v. ASTRUE

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL E. ZELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 29, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0221 RRB GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)