From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zeisler v. Dandridge Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1919
187 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

January, 1919.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ. Order to be settled on notice before Mr. Justice Blackmar.


Motion for reargument denied. Motion in Appeal No. 3 granted to the extent of amending the order so as to provide that, in case such amendment be had and costs paid, the judgment be opened.


Summaries of

Zeisler v. Dandridge Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1919
187 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Zeisler v. Dandridge Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MILTON ZEISLER, Appellant, v. DANDRIDGE COMPANY, INC., Respondent. (Appeal…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1919

Citations

187 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)