From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zeigler v. Koher

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 1, 2010
127 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-1570.

December 1, 2010.

In Quo Warranto.


Motion and Procedural Rulings.

Relator's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Relator's suggestion for substitution as respondent is recognized. Respondent's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Sua sponte. an alternative writ is granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac. R. 10.6:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after filing of respondent's brief. 2010-1651. State v. Hudson. ("Mark App. No. 09-CA-01, 2010-Ohio-839. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.


Summaries of

Zeigler v. Koher

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 1, 2010
127 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

Zeigler v. Koher

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Zeigler v. Koher

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 1, 2010

Citations

127 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2010)
2010 Ohio 5762

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Zeigler v. Zumbar

{¶ 9} On September 7, 2010, Zeigler filed this action for a writ of quo warranto to oust Allbritain and to be…

Stark Cty. Treasurer v. Frustaci

{¶21} Allbritain filed an answer and a motion for judgment on the pleadings, but Kenneth N. Koher, appointed…