From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zeid v. Kimberley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 1, 1999
201 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 1999)

Opinion


201 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 1999) Richard ZEID and Siom Misrahi, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John A. KIMBERLEY, Frank M. Richardson, Mark A. Rowlinson, and Firefox Communications, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-16070. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit November 1, 1999

D.C. No. CV-96-20136-SW. Argued and Submitted Sept. 14, 1998. Submission Deferred Sept. 24, 1999

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Resubmitted Oct. 28, 1999.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Spencer M. Williams, Senior District Judge, Presiding.

Before CANBY, KLEINFELD, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in the light of Janas v. McCracken (In re Silicon Graphics Inc. Sec. Litig.), 183 F.3d 970 (9th Cir.1999).


Summaries of

Zeid v. Kimberley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 1, 1999
201 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 1999)
Case details for

Zeid v. Kimberley

Case Details

Full title:Richard ZEID and Siom Misrahi, on behalf of themselves and all others…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 1, 1999

Citations

201 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Zeid v. Kimberley

Purchasers appealed. The Court of Appeals, 201 F.3d 446, vacated and remanded for reconsideration. The…