From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zeggio v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1912
153 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)

Opinion

November, 1912.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Clarke, Scott, Miller and Dowling, JJ.


Except in a case specified in subdivision 3 of section 888 of the Code of Civil Procedure, an application for a commission to take the deposition of a witness without the State "must be granted, upon satisfactory proof of the facts authorizing it, unless the court or judge has reason to believe that the application is not made in good faith.', (Code Civ. Proc. § 889; Oakes v. Riter, 118 App. Div. 772.) Laches furnishes sufficient reason to deny a stay of the trial of the action pending a return of the commission but is not of itself sufficient to justify a denial of the motion for a commission. The order of September 4, 1912, is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.


Order of September 4, 1912, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Appeal from order of August 16, 1912, dismissed. Motion for stay granted, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.


Summaries of

Zeggio v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1912
153 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Case details for

Zeggio v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:HELEN R. ZEGGIO and MARY R. ALBEE, Respondents, v . DURYEA REMSEN ROBINSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1912

Citations

153 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)