From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zee v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Nov 12, 2020
309 So. 3d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D20-372

11-12-2020

Arlene ZEE, Appellant, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, etc., Appellee.

Neustein Law Group, P.A., and Nicole R. Moskowitz, for appellant. Howard Law Group, and Shakiva L. Brown (Boca Raton), for appellee.


Neustein Law Group, P.A., and Nicole R. Moskowitz, for appellant.

Howard Law Group, and Shakiva L. Brown (Boca Raton), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Bartram v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 211 So. 3d 1009, 1012 (Fla. 2016) ("When a mortgage foreclosure action is involuntarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 1.420(b), either with or without prejudice, the effect of the involuntary dismissal is revocation of the acceleration, which then reinstates the mortgagor's right to continue to make payments on the note and the right of the mortgagee, to seek acceleration and foreclosure based on the mortgagor's subsequent defaults. Accordingly, the statute of limitations does not continue to run on the amount due under the note and mortgage.").


Summaries of

Zee v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Nov 12, 2020
309 So. 3d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Zee v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB

Case Details

Full title:Arlene Zee, Appellant, v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, etc.…

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Nov 12, 2020

Citations

309 So. 3d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)