From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zavaro v. Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1966
26 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

July 7, 1966


In two negligence actions (which were tried jointly), defendant Zavaro in the second above-entitled action appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 23, 1964 on a jury verdict as was in favor of the plaintiff Cora E. Mann in both her individual and fiduciary capacities. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law; the second above-entitled action is severed, and a new trial thereof directed, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the receipt of the expert testimony constituted reversible error (see Lopez v. Yannotti, 24 A.D.2d 758; Lombard v. Dobson, 16 A.D.2d 1031; Mercadante v. Barry Transp. Co., 23 A.D.2d 653). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Rabin, J., concurs in reversal of the judgment, insofar as appealed from, and the direction of a new trial on the ground stated in the memorandum of the majority, and on the additional ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence.


Summaries of

Zavaro v. Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1966
26 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Zavaro v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. ZAVARO et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORA E. MANN, Defendant. CORA E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Wright

Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted to both defendants, with one bill of costs to defendants…