From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zavala v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MCALLEN DIVISION
Oct 9, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:18-CV-247 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:18-CV-247

10-09-2018

CARLOS SALAZAR ZAVALA Petitioner v. LORIE DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DISMISSAL

The Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation regarding Petitioner Carlos Zavala's action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After having reviewed the said Report and Recommendation, and no objections having been filed by either party, the Court is of the opinion that the conclusions in said Report and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the conclusions in United States Magistrate Judge Juan F. Alanis' Report and Recommendation entered as Docket Entry No. 2 are hereby adopted by this Court.

FURTHER, the Court, having adopted the magistrate judge's conclusions, is of the opinion that a certificate of appealability should be DENIED, and that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 should be DISMISSED.

The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of October, 2018, at McAllen, Texas.

/s/_________

Randy Crane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Zavala v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MCALLEN DIVISION
Oct 9, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:18-CV-247 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Zavala v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS SALAZAR ZAVALA Petitioner v. LORIE DAVIS, Director, Texas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MCALLEN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 9, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:18-CV-247 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2018)

Citing Cases

Sanchez-Hernandez v. Guerra

Here, Petitioner is not in immigration custody but, rather, is in state custody awaiting . further…