From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zarr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 25, 2006
920 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D05-2489.

January 25, 2006.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Mandamus.

Edwin S. Zarr, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.


The petitioner, Edwin Zarr, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on a motion he filed on or about March 3, 2005. As the motion was sent to the clerk of the circuit court, but apparently was not forwarded to the trial court, and the petitioner failed to send a copy of his petition directly to the trial court, we conclude that mandamus would be inappropriate. The trial court now has a copy of the petitioner's motion, and we feel confident that it will be ruled on in a timely fashion.

Petition denied.


Summaries of

Zarr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 25, 2006
920 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Zarr v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edwin S. ZARR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 25, 2006

Citations

920 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)