From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zaritsky v. Thrifty 381 Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 7, 1971
67 Misc. 2d 148 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)

Opinion

June 7, 1971

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, PHILIP J. ZICHELLO, J.

Milton Davidoff for appellants.

Rupert Holland for respondents.


The owner of a cleaning store which merely collects clothing for cleaning elsewhere and contains no highly flammable material has no duty, in the absence of statute, to install a sprinkler or other fire alarm system. It was error to predicate a finding of negligence on failure to install such apparatus. Since a bailee for mutual benefit is not an insurer and no liability exists for loss of property by him as a result of fire where negligence has not been established ( Hale v. Platek, 182 N.Y.S. 750; Equitable Paper Bag Co. v. Long Is. R.R. Co., 172 Misc. 934; DeOnis v. Schmeltzer, 71 N.Y.S.2d 384) substantial justice "according to the rules of substantive law" (CCA, § 1804) requires reversal.

The judgments should be reversed, without costs and complaints dismissed.

Concur — LUPIANO, J.P., MARKOWITZ and GOLD, JJ.

Judgments reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Zaritsky v. Thrifty 381 Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 7, 1971
67 Misc. 2d 148 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)
Case details for

Zaritsky v. Thrifty 381 Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOYCE ZARITSKY, Respondent, v. THRIFTY 381 STORES, INC., Appellant ROSALIE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1971

Citations

67 Misc. 2d 148 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)
324 N.Y.S.2d 476

Citing Cases

Singer Co. v. Stott Davis

There was no evidence in this case of any act by EMA which may have contributed to the development of such…

Peralta v. Port of New York Auth

f) " A bailee for mutual benefit is not an insurer and no liability exists for loss of property by [bailee] *…