In its proprietory capacity, "a municipality is under a duty to maintain its park and playground facilities in a reasonably safe condition" (Nicholson v Board of Educ., 36 N.Y.2d 798, 799). This duty "includes not only physical care of the property but also prevention of ultrahazardous and criminal activity of which it has knowledge" (Benjamin v City of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 44, 46). Bicycle riding on a busy promenade does not rise to the level of "ultrahazardous and criminal" (see, Zarillo v State of New York, 8 A.D.2d 651, affd 7 N.Y.2d 943; cf. Benjamin v City of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 44, supra; Caldwell v Village of Is. Park, 304 N.Y. 268; Nicholson v Board of Educ., 36 N.Y.2d 798, supra). Thus, as a matter of law, the city did not breach its duty to plaintiffs.
According to the defendants City of New York and City of New York Parks and Recreation (hereinafter the municipal defendants), they did not provide any equipment, such as bases, to the teams who came to play at their fields and such teams supplied their own bases. In response to the municipal defendants' prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law that they did not breach their duty of maintaining the park in a reasonably safe condition by failing to prevent an ultrahazardous or dangerous activity or condition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Solomon v City of New York, 66 NY2d 1026, 1027; Marino v State of New York, 16 AD3d 386, 387; Muzich v Bonomolo, 209 AD2d 387, 388; Adams v New York City Hous. Auth., 165 AD2d 849; Zarillo v State of New York, 8 AD2d 651, 652, affd 7 NY2d 943 [I960]). The little league also established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853).
Judgment, entered July 25, 1963 on an order, directing a verdict in favor of defendants, unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. (Cf. Rapisardi v. Board of Educ., 242 App. Div. 647; Lutzker v. Board of Educ., 262 App. Div. 881, affd. 287 N.Y. 822; Zarillo v. State of New York, 8 A.D.2d 651, affd. 7 N.Y.2d 943.) Concur — Botein, P.J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.