From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zarefakis v. Matuska

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 11, 2005
No. MISC.S-04-0295 DFL DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2005)

Opinion

No. MISC.S-04-0295 DFL DAD PS.

November 11, 2005


ORDER


The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 3, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Zarefakis v. Matuska

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 11, 2005
No. MISC.S-04-0295 DFL DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2005)
Case details for

Zarefakis v. Matuska

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ZAREFAKIS, Plaintiff, v. RICK MATUSKA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 11, 2005

Citations

No. MISC.S-04-0295 DFL DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2005)