From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zaragoza v. Sentry Recovery & Collections, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 15, 2013
2:12-CV-2037 JCM (NJK) (D. Nev. Mar. 15, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-CV-2037 JCM (NJK)

03-15-2013

ROGELIO ZARAGOZA, Plaintiff(s), v. SENTRY RECOVERY & COLLECTIONS, INC., Defendant(s).


ORDER

Presently before the court is the matter of Zaragoza v. Sentry Recovery & Collections, Inc. (case no. 2:12-cv-02037-JCM-NJK).

On February 21, 2013, plaintiff Rogelio Zaragoza filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. # 11). Plaintiff sought dismissal on the basis that defendant Sentry Recovery & Collection, Inc. had not served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Contrary to plaintiff's representation, defendant filed an answer on January 9, 2013 (see doc. # 6); thus, dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is improper.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the court may dismiss an action at plaintiff's request on terms the court considers proper. Here, the plaintiff is, in effect, requesting the court to dismiss plaintiff's action against defendant with prejudice. . . . . . .

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this matter be, and the same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

______________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Zaragoza v. Sentry Recovery & Collections, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 15, 2013
2:12-CV-2037 JCM (NJK) (D. Nev. Mar. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Zaragoza v. Sentry Recovery & Collections, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO ZARAGOZA, Plaintiff(s), v. SENTRY RECOVERY & COLLECTIONS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 15, 2013

Citations

2:12-CV-2037 JCM (NJK) (D. Nev. Mar. 15, 2013)