Zaragoza v. Hidalgo Cty. Dist. Clerk

Full title: RAUL CASER ZARAGOZA, Relator v. HIDALGO COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 11, 2008

No. WR-43,681-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. WR-43,681-04

Delivered: June 11, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for A Writ of Mandamus, Cause No. CR-1432-95-D in the 206^th Judicial District Court from Hidalgo County.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 206^th Judicial District Court of Hidalgo County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the District Clerk of Hidalgo County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order designating issues to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992); stating that the claims asserted in the application filed by Relator are not cognizable under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3; or stating that Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Hidalgo County. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.