Opinion
6:23-cv-1149-RBD-LHP
11-19-2024
ZAP AVIATION, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NXT JET, INC., Defendant
ORDER
LESLIE HOFFMAN PRICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:
MOTION: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW (Doc. No. 103)
FILED: November 18, 2024
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice.
The motion, which was filed at 4:40 p.m. on the response deadline, fails to include a memorandum of legal authority as required by Local Rule 3.01(a), nor does it comply with Local Rule 3.01(g). See Doc. No. 103, at 1, n.1 (stating that Zap consents to the relief sought, but no mention of Defendant). In addition, the motion fails to comply with most of the requirements of Local Rule 1.11. See Local Rule 1.11(a), (b). And the Court notes that “[s]ealing is not authorized by a confidentiality agreement,” Local Rule 1.11(a), which is the sole basis for the request. See Doc. No. 103.
Plaintiff shall either file a renewed motion to seal in full compliance with all applicable Local Rules or its response (with all attachments) on the public docket no later than 12:00 p.m. on November 20, 2024. This deadline will not be extended and failure to meet this deadline will result in the motion for protective order being deemed unopposed.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on November 19, 2024.