From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zanki v. Cahill

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 11, 2004
812 N.E.2d 1257 (N.Y. 2004)

Opinion

Decided May 11, 2004.

Before: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and Smith concur.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the alleged injuries resulted from a dangerous recurring condition of which defendant Cushman Wakefield had actual or constructive notice.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Zanki v. Cahill

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 11, 2004
812 N.E.2d 1257 (N.Y. 2004)
Case details for

Zanki v. Cahill

Case Details

Full title:ENISA ZANKI, ET AL., Appellants, v. GERALD K. CAHILL, ET AL., Defendants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 11, 2004

Citations

812 N.E.2d 1257 (N.Y. 2004)