From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zanesville v. Rouse

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 17, 2010
2010 Ohio 3754 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-1282.

Submitted August 10, 2010.

Decided August 17, 2010.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Muskingum County, No. CT08-0035, 2009-Ohio-2689.

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Scott T. Hillis, Zanesville Law Director, and Susan E. Small, Assistant Law Director, for appellant.

Elizabeth N. Gaba and David T. Spencer, for appellee.


{¶ 1} On May 26, 2010, the court reversed the judgment of the court of appeals in this case and reinstated the judgment of the trial court. Zanesville v. Rouse, 126 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-2218, 929 N.E.2d 1044.

{¶ 2} Appellee filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing in part that the court of appeals did not consider several assignments of error raised by appellee.

{¶ 3} The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent: The portion of the court's May 26, 2010 judgment reinstating the judgment of the trial court is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of appellee's assignments of error held to be moot below.

BROWN, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Zanesville v. Rouse

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 17, 2010
2010 Ohio 3754 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

Zanesville v. Rouse

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF ZANESVILLE, APPELLANT, v. ROUSE, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 17, 2010

Citations

2010 Ohio 3754 (Ohio 2010)
2010 Ohio 3754
933 N.E.2d 260

Citing Cases

Welsh Development Co. v. Warren Cty. Reg. Plan

It means taking a document to a clerk of courts for file-stamping as a court record. Zanesville v. Rouse, 126…

The State ex rel. Parker v. Black

{¶ 18} Parker relies on State v. Sharp, 5th Dist. Knox Nos. 08 CA 000002, 08 CA 000003 and 08 CA 000004,…