Opinion
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02121-REB-BNB.
July 16, 2010
ORDER
This matter arises on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Investigation Documents [Doc. # 90, filed 7/2/2010] (the "Motion to Compel"). I held a hearing on the motion this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Compel [Doc. # 90] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before July 26, 2010, the defendants shall substantiate their claim that certain documents are subject to the Colorado quality assurance privilege, section 25-3-109, C.R.S., by means of a sufficient privilege log, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5) and Peat, Marwick, Mitchell Co. v. West, 748 F.2d 540, 542 (10th Cir. 1984); a supporting affidavit; or otherwise.