From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zamora v. Smith

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 26, 2006
D.C. No. CV-01-149-PHX-DOC, Appeal No. 05-15622 (D. Ariz. Jun. 26, 2006)

Opinion

D.C. No. CV-01-149-PHX-DOC, Appeal No. 05-15622.

June 26, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed three motions regarding "missing transcripts transcribed at Government expense due to altered transcript order form dated [April, 28, 2005]." Docs. ##228-30. Plaintiff claims that his transcript order form has been altered and that he is entitled to receive copies of transcripts of the pretrial proceedings in this case at Government expense. Id. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, has authorized the production of transcripts at Government expense only for the trial dates, January 18-21, 2005. Doc. #231. Plaintiff has received copies of such transcripts at Government expense. See Doc. #229 Ex. A. The Court accordingly will deny Plaintiff's motions. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions regarding missing transcripts (Docs. ##228-30) are denied.


Summaries of

Zamora v. Smith

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 26, 2006
D.C. No. CV-01-149-PHX-DOC, Appeal No. 05-15622 (D. Ariz. Jun. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Zamora v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:Danny Santos Zamora, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Alan Hedger Smith; and…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 26, 2006

Citations

D.C. No. CV-01-149-PHX-DOC, Appeal No. 05-15622 (D. Ariz. Jun. 26, 2006)