From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zamora v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
CASE NO. CV 12-3798-MWF (PJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 12-3798-MWF (PJW)

05-08-2013

ESEQUIEL ZAMORA, Petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

____________________________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Zamora v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
CASE NO. CV 12-3798-MWF (PJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Zamora v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:ESEQUIEL ZAMORA, Petitioner, v. M. D. BITER, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. CV 12-3798-MWF (PJW) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)