From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zambrano v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 16, 2019
No. 75807-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 16, 2019)

Opinion

No. 75807-COA

07-16-2019

JACQUELINE ZAMBRANO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Jacqueline Zambrano appeals from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea of conspiracy to commit robbery, robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, and burglary while in possession of a deadly weapon. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.

Zambrano claims the district court abused its discretion at sentencing by not awarding her credit for time served in presentence confinement in this case. She asserts "she is entitled to credit for the time spent in custody on the instant offense from the date of her arrest on June 14, 2016, until her sentencing on March 26, 2018, for a total of 651 days." And she argues "[t]he lower court's refusal to grant any credit for time served in the instant case because credit was granted in case C-16-312638-1 is wrong."

We review a district court's sentencing decision for abuse of discretion. Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 348, 213 P.3d 476, 490 (2009). A defendant is only entitled to presentence credit for the amount of time actually spent in confinement. NRS 176.055(1) allows a district court to credit a defendant's sentence "for the amount of time which the defendant has actually spent in confinement." See State v. Second Judicial Disk Court (Jackson), 121 Nev. 413, 416, 116 P.3d 834, 836 (2005) (further defining the district court's authority to award credit for time spent in pretrial confinement).

Here, the record on appeal demonstrates that the 651 days Zambrano served in presentence confinement between June 14, 2016, and March 26, 2018, was applied to her sentence in district court case number C-16-312638-1. Consequently, she has already received credit for this period of presentence confinement and she is not entitled to additional presentence credit in the instant case. Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Bulla cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge

Law Offices of Martin Hart, LLC

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Zambrano v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 16, 2019
No. 75807-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Zambrano v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE ZAMBRANO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 16, 2019

Citations

No. 75807-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 16, 2019)