From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zaiza v. Clark

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 13, 2021
1:19-cv-01476-DAD-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01476-DAD-GSA-PC

09-13-2021

JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA, Plaintiffs, v. CLARK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC (ECF NO. 20.)

ORDER DEEMING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TIMELY FILED (ECF No. 21.)

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Jose Roberto Zaiza (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on October 17, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) This case now proceeds with the First Amended Complaint filed on February 18, 2021, against defendants Ken Clark (Warden), Captain J. Gallagher, and D. Baughman (CDCR Acting Associate Director) (collectively, “Defendants”) for subjecting Plaintiff to adverse conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 13.)

On July 12, 2021, Defendants filed a request for extension of time to respond to the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 20.) On September 10, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 21.)

Given that Defendants filed their response to the First Amended Complaint on September 10, 2021, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' request for extension of time is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Zaiza v. Clark

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 13, 2021
1:19-cv-01476-DAD-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Zaiza v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA, Plaintiffs, v. CLARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01476-DAD-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)