From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zahniser v. White

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Dec 13, 1934
3 Cal.App.2d 44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)

Opinion

Docket No. 1175.

December 13, 1934.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. Appeal dismissed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

No appearance for Appellant.

Maurice M. Myers for Respondents.


This motion to dismiss the appeal herein is supported by the certificate of the county clerk and the facts therein stated are not contradicted. [1] It is thereby made to appear that the only step in furtherance of the appeal which has been taken by appellant was the filing of a notice of appeal on April 19, 1933. No bill of exceptions has been settled, as provided in section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure and no transcript has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of said code. The statutory period within which a record may be filed on appeal under either of the methods of appeal provided for by the Code of Civil Procedure has expired. It follows that the motion should be granted. ( People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal.App. 139 [ 283 P. 981]; rule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.)

The appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Zahniser v. White

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Dec 13, 1934
3 Cal.App.2d 44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
Case details for

Zahniser v. White

Case Details

Full title:ELLIS C. ZAHNISER, Appellant, v. JANE DOE WHITE et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 13, 1934

Citations

3 Cal.App.2d 44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
38 P.2d 827